Curriculum

A colleague who has read everything.

Your curriculum lives in a planning system as hundreds of units and thousands of lessons. Nobody has read all of it. Edda has, and she answers in the flow of work: in Claude, in plain language, grounded in your school's own materials, with the source linked every time.

For coordinators

See the whole picture, honestly.

Coordinator questions are whole-curriculum questions. They need someone who has read everything, not a search box.

Programme coherence

Assess the programme of inquiry per year and per theme. Which units genuinely build their central idea, which are collections of activities, and what to do about it.

Coverage you can trust

Standards coverage read from lesson content rather than tags, across every framework in your library, with the untagged gaps listed.

Conceptual balance

How key concepts, approaches to learning, learner profile, and student action spread across the programme: what is over-relied on and what is under-served.

A supportive coaching signal

Who would benefit from planning coaching, and on what, from the completeness and quality of what they author. A signal for support, never a league table.

Year on year

Compare this year's programme to last year's: what was added, dropped, or rewritten, and whether quality moved.

Everything as a document

Any review, map, or report leaves as a finished Word document with your school's name on it, ready for a staff meeting or a board pack.

For teachers

Plan and improve, grounded in your own units.

Nothing generic. Every suggestion starts from the unit the teacher is actually teaching, and every output is a proposal for their judgement.

Plan a lesson

For a real line of inquiry, in the unit's own context, with a teaching sequence, formative checks, and links back to the central idea.

Improve a unit

A craft review of the central idea, lines of inquiry, and lesson arc, with concrete suggestions and the reasoning shown.

Differentiate

SEN and EAL adaptations with stretch, specific to the lesson rather than a generic checklist.

Design assessment

Single-point rubrics and formative tasks that fit the unit's goals.

Launch and connect

Provocations to open a unit, genuine transdisciplinary connections across the programme, and inquiry activities that fit.

Reflect after teaching

A reflection scaffold specific to the lesson: the evidence to look for, likely misconceptions, and the single highest-value tweak.

The ground rules

Grounded, sourced, and yours to decide.

Grounded in your school

Every answer comes from your real units and lessons, with the source linked. If it is not in your curriculum, she says so.

She suggests, you decide

Nothing writes back to your planning system. Every output is a proposal for professional judgement.

No student data

Curriculum and staff planning only. Never children's records.

Give her your curriculum for a fortnight.

A pilot connects a few staff to your real programme. Coordinators get the honest picture; teachers get a colleague. Then you decide.

Book a demo