AI literacy

Embedded in real units, and evidenced.

Regulators now require AI literacy across every year group, with a deadline attached. The tempting answer is a bolt-on scheme of work nobody owns. The better answer is to build it into the curriculum you already teach, and to keep the evidence as you go. That is what Edda does.

The integration map

An honest map, not a reassuring dashboard.

Edda reads every framework competency against every unit you actually teach, content rather than tags, and gives each one a straight answer.

Ready to embed

A unit you already teach is an authentic home for this competency. The map links straight to it, and each Head of Year gets their own slice.

Hybrid

Part of the competency fits an existing unit; part needs dedicated time. The map shows the split rather than rounding it up to done.

New unit needed

No honest home exists. Edda holds ready-designed standalone units, with quality-checked lesson plans, localised to your programme when you want them.

From map to classroom

Touchpoints inside lessons teachers already teach.

Integration is not a new subject. For each competency and its host unit, Edda drafts the classroom moment: ten to fifteen minutes inside a lesson that already exists, grounded in that unit's real central idea and lessons. Where a competency needs reinforcement, she designs a spaced sequence across the unit's own arc instead of a single touch.

The touchpoint

What to do, where in the unit it lands, and how it serves both the unit's idea and the competency. Cached so every teacher gets consistent guidance.

The assessment

The framework's own progression tiers become a classroom rubric, with the evidence to collect and a light task that fits how the competency is delivered.

The delivery record

Staff record each touchpoint as built, then taught, then evidenced. Forward-only, with an audit note. The map becomes the record.

The submission

Drafted from what actually happened.

When the regulator asks for your implementation plan, Edda assembles it from the real pieces: the organisational readiness scorecard, the curriculum coverage, the gap-closing plan, and the governance around it. A dated, phased draft that reaches the deadline, exported as a document, with formal submission staying in your hands.

Grounded answers for staff

Anyone can ask what the framework expects, in chat, and get the framework's own words back: indicator codes cited, descriptors quoted verbatim, and an honest “the framework does not address that” when it doesn't.

Readiness beyond the curriculum

A six-domain organisational scorecard covers leadership, teacher capacity, technology, integration, monitoring, and student exposure, with a prioritised remediation roadmap.

See your own map first.

A pilot starts by reading your real curriculum and showing you the honest picture: what is already covered, what fits where, and what genuinely needs new time. Before you commit to anything.

Book a demo